Case Summaries
Injury & Tort Law
[08/07]
Lockerby v. Sierra In the bankruptcy context, an intentional breach of contract cannot give rise to nondischargeability under 11 U.S.C. section 523(a)(6) unless it is accompanied by conduct that constitutes a tort under state law.
[08/07]
Muhammad v. McCarrell In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against a Supermax Unit and several of its officers raising a tort claim for battery and alleging that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when officers used excessive force to extract him from his cell, judgment pursuant to a jury verdict for defendants is affirmed where: 1) the evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdict; and 2) defense attorney's comments during closing arguments did not unfairly prejudice the jury.
[08/06]
Iko v. Raley In a survival and wrongful death action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 following inmate's death after being forcibly removed from his cell by seven correctional officers, defendants' interlocutory appeal from a partial denial of qualified immunity is dismissed in part and affirmed in part where: 1) there was no jurisdiction over one of the three claims presented on appeal because summary judgment was denied on the sole ground that issues of material fact remained; and 2) plaintiffs alleged facts sufficient to show that the officers violated certain of decedent's clearly established Eighth Amendment rights.
More...
Consumer Products
[08/07]
Peck v. Cingular Wireless, LLC In a class action lawsuit brought by a former employee against Cingular claiming, inter alia, it violated state law by passing a business and occupation tax (B&O tax) on to consumers in the form of a line item charge, dismissal of the suit is vacated where, contrary to the ruling below, there was no federal preemption of plaintiff's state law claims.
[08/07]
Chin v. Chrysler LLC In a products-liability action claiming defects in braking systems in defendant's cars, an order awarding attorney's fees under California law is reversed where: 1) no substantive provision of California law had ever been pled, nor had any underlying California cause of action ever been found violated; and 2) the district court was bound to apply New Jersey's attorney's fees rule.
[08/05]
E.T. Browne Drug Co. v. Cococare Prods., Inc. In a trademark dispute between manufacturers of beauty and personal-care products over the allegedly trademarked phrase "Cocoa Butter Formula," summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the phrase was generic or descriptive; but 2) plaintiff did not produce evidence to show that the phrase had acquired secondary meaning sufficient to create a protectable trademark interest.
More...
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
|